Discernment — ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Field-Reading – Week 35

Week 35 has not felt like a week for looking away. It has been emotional, confronting and at times deeply uncomfortable, because again and again I have found myself standing in situations where the same question has appeared: When does compassion need to become discernment, and when does discernment finally need to become a boundary?

Last week I wrote about The Good Life, about inner peace and about learning that we do not have to enter every storm simply because it appears around us. I still believe this deeply. But something important needs to be added, because living peacefully does not mean becoming passive, and protecting our inner peace cannot become an excuse for refusing to see what is happening around us. There are moments when silence is wisdom, but there are also moments when silence protects precisely the behavior that needs to be challenged. There are times when walking away is the most conscious thing we can do, and other times when something inside us rises and says: No, this matters. Enough is enough.

This week, that distinction has become very real for me.

When the System Itself Begins to Speak

On August 26, Tromsø Municipality was officially entered into Norway’s ROBEK register, which means that the municipality is now subject to additional state oversight of its financial decisions. The official reason is clear: the accumulated operating deficit has grown beyond the statutory threshold, and budgets, borrowing and certain long-term financial commitments will consequently be subject to external control.

Being placed in ROBEK does not, by itself, tell us that everything inside a municipality is wrong. Municipal finances are complex, and sometimes enormous amounts of money are spent precisely because communities are trying to care for people who genuinely need support: older people, children, people living with illness or disability, families in crisis and people whose lives depend upon functioning public services. Across Troms and Finnmark, many municipalities are currently struggling with deficits, high debt and limited financial reserves.

But because I work inside this world, the announcement touched something much closer to home for me. I see what happens when large systems become so layered that responsibility can disappear between offices, titles, procedures and administrative levels. I see how much energy can be consumed by structures before help reaches the person who actually needs it. And I have encountered behaviors that I experience as dishonest, manipulative, evasive or unwilling to take responsibility. I have sat opposite people who have lied in my face, and rather than smiling politely and carrying the discomfort home with me, I have increasingly begun to say so. Not every problem is corruption, not every mistake is manipulation, and not every person who disagrees with us is an enemy. Discernment requires us to know the difference.

And that distinction matters enormously.

Why I Became Angry

I have been genuinely angry this week, and instead of immediately trying to spiritualize the anger away, I have listened to it. Because sometimes anger is information. When irresponsibility exists in a system that serves vulnerable people, the consequences do not remain inside an office or disappear into an organizational chart. Eventually they reach somebody’s body, somebody’s home and somebody’s life. When people avoid responsibilities, when communication fails, when decisions are postponed unnecessarily or when individuals become more concerned with protecting themselves than fulfilling the purpose of their role, somebody else carries the cost. And when the people carrying that cost are sick, vulnerable or dependent upon others for basic support, I find it very difficult simply to observe from a comfortable distance. This is where Week 35 has challenged me.

Which battles are actually mine?

When I was younger, I entered almost every battle. If something felt unjust, I wanted to correct it. If somebody behaved badly, I wanted to confront it. If a system did not work, I wanted to tear it apart and rebuild it before lunch. I no longer live that way. There is wisdom in choosing our battles, because our life force is precious and we can exhaust ourselves fighting everything that is wrong with the world. But choosing our battles cannot mean choosing none of them.

Discernment asks something more difficult of us: Is this mine to address? Will my silence protect peace or protect dysfunction? Am I reacting from my own wound, or responding because something genuinely needs to be said? Who carries the consequences if everybody decides to look away?

The Rotten Apple

We often use the expression a rotten apple when talking about unhealthy organizations, and I have thought about that image several times this week. One rotten apple does not mean the entire basket is rotten. There are extraordinary people working inside imperfect systems every single day. I have met them. People who quietly do more than their job description requires, who care deeply, who take responsibility, who find solutions rather than excuses and who remember that behind every case number is a human being. Discernment means seeing them too. But the expression contains another truth: what we refuse to address can spread.

Dishonesty that is repeatedly tolerated becomes culture. Avoidance that is rewarded becomes normal. Manipulation that works is likely to be used again. And when responsible people continually compensate for those who refuse responsibility, dysfunctional structures can survive much longer than they otherwise would. That is why Enough Is Enough is not necessarily an angry statement. Sometimes it is an act of care.

It can mean: I will not help this pattern continue.

It can mean: I will no longer pretend I do not see this.

It can mean: I will speak, even if speaking makes the room uncomfortable.

And sometimes it simply means walking away.

Two Lives of Service

In the middle of all this, Week 35 has also carried profound loss.

Norway lost King Harald V on August 28, after more than three decades as our King, and his passing has touched something very deep in me. In the days surrounding his death, I created the song “Hele Norges Bestefar — Whole Norway’s Grandfather” as my own tribute to a man who, for so many of us, represented something far greater than a royal title. There was a warmth, humility and humanity in the way he met people, and a remarkable ability to stand in a position of enormous privilege without losing his connection to ordinary human life. I have therefore decided to create a separate page in honor of King Harald V, not simply to remember the King we have lost, but to explore what his life taught us about service, dignity, humor, belonging, resilience and the kind of leadership that does not need to make itself bigger in order to have an impact.

And in the same week, the world also said goodbye to Dolly Parton — another human being who showed, in a completely different arena, what can happen when visibility, influence and success are turned towards service. Two very different lives, two very different forms of leadership, yet both leave us with a similar question: When we are given influence, resources, a voice or a position in this world, what do we choose to do with it?

There is something important about these two deaths appearing in the same week that I have been thinking about power, responsibility and discernment. Because power can be used to elevate ourselves or power can become service. Influence can be used to manipulate or influence can be used to give something back. A position can become something we hide behind or it can become a place from which we take greater responsibility.

Discernment is not only about recognizing what has become corrupted. It is equally about recognizing what is good, honoring it, strengthening it and becoming more of it ourselves.

Creating Sacred Space

And then, in the beginning of this turbulent week, there was something completely different. I spent time with my cousin-sister in ceremony, and together we made a conscious choice to hold a sacred space in Grøtfjorden for what is coming.

For me, sacred space is not about escaping the world because the world has become too difficult to look at. It is almost the opposite. We create places of stillness so that we can return to the world more clearly. Places where people can breathe, listen, remember what matters and reconnect with something that has not been corrupted by noise, competition, manipulation or fear. We need more of these places now. Not only physical places in nature, but sacred spaces inside families, workplaces, communities and ourselves, where honesty is possible and where human dignity matters more than position, prestige or power. Because it is not enough to expose what is wrong. We must also protect what is good.

Discernment is not cynicism. It is not searching everywhere for enemies, corruption or rotten apples. It is the willingness to look clearly enough to recognize both shadow and goodness without pretending that either does not exist. There will always be battles we choose not to fight. But there will also be moments when something inside us knows: This one matters.

And when that moment arrives, our task is not to scream louder than everyone else, but to stand firmly enough in our own integrity that we can say:

I see what is happening.
I know what I stand for.
I will protect what is good.
And this, I will no longer participate in.

Enough is enough.

Scroll to Top